| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joe Conway" <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Table Function API doc patch |
| Date: | 2002-07-11 02:03:24 |
| Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOEEBDCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Are table functions going to make it into pl/pgsql fro 7.3? I recall there
was a discussion of the syntax, but was any decision made upon a final
syntax?
Chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Joe Conway
> Sent: Thursday, 11 July 2002 7:28 AM
> To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [PATCHES] Table Function API doc patch
>
>
> Here (finally ;-)) is a doc patch covering the Table Function C API. It
> reflects the changes in the tablefunc-fix patch that I sent in the other
> day. It also refers to "see contrib/tablefunc for more examples", which
> is next on my list of things to finish and submit.
>
> If there are no objections, please apply.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2002-07-11 02:41:48 | Re: CLUSTER not lose indexes |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-11 01:34:55 | Re: implementing query timeout |