| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CLUSTER ALL syntax |
| Date: | 2002-11-18 01:53:07 |
| Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOCEJPCEAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> In looking at the CLUSTER ALL patch I have applied, I am now wondering
> why the ALL keyword is used. When we do VACUUM, we don't use ALL.
> VACUUM vacuums all tables. Shouldn't' CLUSTER alone do the same thing.
> And what about REINDEX? That seems to have a different syntax from the
> other two. Seems there should be some consistency.
Yeah - I agree!
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew V. | 2002-11-18 02:27:41 | Re: DECLARE CURSOR |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-11-18 01:50:17 | FW: PostgreSQL 7.3 Platform Testing |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-11-18 02:31:42 | Re: CLUSTER ALL syntax |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-11-18 01:41:27 | documentation fix |