Re: ODBC from win2k to postgres on Linux HELL

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'streethockey(at)ureach(dot)com'" <streethockey(at)ureach(dot)com>
Cc: "'pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ODBC from win2k to postgres on Linux HELL
Date: 2002-03-06 22:04:07
Message-ID: FED2B709E3270E4B903EB0175A49BCB1047672@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

[please keep replies on list]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Webber [mailto:streethockey(at)ureach(dot)com]
> Sent: 06 March 2002 21:50
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: Re: RE: [ODBC] ODBC from win2k to postgres on Linux HELL
>
>
> these are my enrties
>
>
>
> local all trust
> host all 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 trust
> host all 192.168.0.4 255.255.255.255 trust

That looks OK. I did chat to one person recently who got in a mess because
his linux distribution had come with an older version of PostgreSQL
preinstalled, and unaware of this he had installed a new copy, but in a
different location - end result was; he had 2 data directories (and was
editting the wrong pg_hba.conf file) and 2 copies of the libraries and
binaries etc.

Could this be the case on your system?

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wolfgang.Fuertbauer 2002-03-06 22:12:51 Problem with VB-DirectODBC selecting text-fields [Virus checked] [EBEWE Viruschecked]
Previous Message Dave Page 2002-03-06 21:50:56 Re: [ODBC] ODBC from win2k to postgres on Linux HELL