| From: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joshua D(dot) Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
| Date: | 2006-09-25 11:49:27 |
| Message-ID: | FE91DC37-AD49-4F5E-A7C0-ADB5C2E4225C@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sep 22, 2006, at 2:50 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> And how were you planning to tell if a patch cam from a regular?
>>> Hopefully
>>> you weren't planning on blindly trusting the "from" header.
>>> Misuse of the build farm in a way the effects other sites could
>>> get the
>>> project a big black eye, so you want to be very careful building and
>>> executing code from the patch queue.
>> Of course not, but there's any number of ways we could handle that
>> problem.
>
> pgp signed patches?
Just one possibility. Submitting the patches via a web page that you
have to log into is another.
--
Jim Nasby jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-09-25 12:01:04 | Re: Windows build farm failures |
| Previous Message | Markus Schaber | 2006-09-25 11:17:33 | Small docu mismatch |