Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Date: 2006-09-22 18:50:52
Message-ID: 4514308C.9040604@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:58:04AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 22:22:12 -0700,
>> Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> wrote:
>>> That's a worthwhile point. How many patches come from the general
>>> community vs out of the blue? Patches from regulars could probably get a
>>> free pass, which might cut down the review burden substantially.
>> And how were you planning to tell if a patch cam from a regular? Hopefully
>> you weren't planning on blindly trusting the "from" header.
>> Misuse of the build farm in a way the effects other sites could get the
>> project a big black eye, so you want to be very careful building and
>> executing code from the patch queue.
>
> Of course not, but there's any number of ways we could handle that
> problem.

pgp signed patches?

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-09-22 18:55:15 Re: silent install: silent error (even using the manual)
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-09-22 18:45:53 Re: Release Notes: Major Changes in 8.2