| From: | Oleksii Kliukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: rows estimate in explain analyze for the BRIN index | 
| Date: | 2015-12-30 17:28:21 | 
| Message-ID: | FB871749-F65D-439D-8AC3-D13550595BE5@hintbits.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
> On 30 Dec 2015, at 17:44, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> 
> Oleksii Kliukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com> writes:
>>> On 30 Dec 2015, at 17:02, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Another idea would be to use the heap's row density as calculated
>>> by the last ANALYZE (ie, reltuples/relpages), with a fallback to 100
>>> if relpages=0.  This'd only be convenient if the bitmap scan node has
>>> the parent heap rel open, which it might not.
> 
>> +1
> 
> Any objections to the attached?
Looks good to me. On my sample system with 100K rows, the new version gives me:
— CREATE TABLE test AS SELECT id FROM generate_series(1,100000) id;
— CREATE INDEX ON test USING brin(id);
postgres=# explain analyze select 1 from test where id = 500;
                                                       QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Bitmap Heap Scan on test  (cost=12.01..16.02 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.199..4.220 rows=1 loops=1)
   Recheck Cond: (id = 500)
   Rows Removed by Index Recheck: 28927
   Heap Blocks: lossy=128
   ->  Bitmap Index Scan on test_id_idx  (cost=0.00..12.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.072..0.072 rows=28800 loops=1)
         Index Cond: (id = 500)
 Planning time: 0.433 ms
 Execution time: 4.323 ms
(8 rows)
which is much closer to the actual number of rows removed by the index recheck + the one left.
--
Oleksii
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-30 17:30:43 | Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly? | 
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-12-30 17:23:16 | Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly? |