| From: | "carl garland" <carlhgarland(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au |
| Cc: | markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems |
| Date: | 2001-05-04 04:58:27 |
| Message-ID: | F80udzxxfYXFrwiZ9rW00001ad0@hotmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> > Just put a note in the installation docs that the place where the
>database
> > is initialised to should be on a non-Reiser, non-XFS mount...
>
>Sure, we can do that now.
I still think this is not necessarily the right approach either. One
major purpose of using a journaling fs is for fast boot up time after
crash. If you have a 100 GB database you may wish to have the data
on XFS. I do think that the WAL log should be on a separate disk and
on a non-journaling fs for performance.
Best Regards,
Carl Garland
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rainer Mager | 2001-05-04 05:16:39 | log files |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2001-05-04 04:33:22 | RE: Duplicate constraint names in 7.0.3 |