Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10

From: Enrico Sirola <enrico(dot)sirola(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin <justin(at)emproshunts(dot)com>
Cc: Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10
Date: 2008-03-17 20:58:31
Message-ID: F582459A-C80F-40EE-B266-FC8C1131EFC7@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi Justin,

Il giorno 17/mar/08, alle ore 20:38, Justin ha scritto:
> it is a RAID 10 controller with 6 SAS 10K 73 gig drives. The
> server is 3 weeks old now.
>
> it has 16 gigs of RAM
> 2 quad core Xenon 1.88 Ghz processors
> 2 gig Ethernet cards. RAID controller perc 6/i with battery backup
> 512meg cache, setup not lie about fsync
>
> WAL is on a RAID 0 drive along with the OS

Did you try with a single raid 10 hosting DB + WAL? It gave me much
better performances on similar hardware
Bye,
e.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2008-03-17 21:57:20 Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10
Previous Message Justin 2008-03-17 19:38:19 Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10