Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

From: "carl garland" <carlhgarland(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar, RDNELSON(at)co(dot)centre(dot)pa(dot)us, davidb(at)vectormath(dot)com, mfork(at)toledolink(dot)com, poulc(at)cs(dot)auc(dot)dk
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
Date: 2000-11-15 08:40:28
Message-ID: F289DS7hx27kBnccYTj000056fd@hotmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

>perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went
>significantly above 10/sec?

I think alot of it has to do with the web server/db setup not pg. They are
using Apache/PHP and looking at their code every page has the additional
overhead of making the db connection. Now if they had used AOLserver with
its persistent db connecction pooling scheme they may have faired better ;)

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message igor 2000-11-15 09:26:03 Dump problem
Previous Message Christopher Farley 2000-11-15 05:53:23 FOREIGN KEY DEFERRABLE

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2000-11-15 09:31:28 Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-15 06:47:47 Re: Problem with BETWEEN and a view.