Re: the IN clause saga

From: Darin Ohashi <DOhashi(at)maplesoft(dot)com>
To: "'Fernando Nasser'" <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Darin Ohashi <DOhashi(at)maplesoft(dot)com>
Cc: Felipe Schnack <felipes(at)ritterdosreis(dot)br>, Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: the IN clause saga
Date: 2003-07-22 17:32:32
Message-ID: F17255C2B596D3119A5600508B44FA68052EB879@courier.maplesoft.on.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

> > I'm not sure if this makes sense, but could you have a
> conflict between a set
> > containing a single element that is the array and a set
> containing the elements
> > of the array.
> >
>
> You will need to have an Array of Arrays in that case.
>

Will this requirement violate the SQL standard for PREPARE/EXECUTE?

Darin

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fernando Nasser 2003-07-22 17:33:35 Re: the IN clause saga
Previous Message peter royal 2003-07-22 17:30:24 Re: the IN clause saga