| From: | "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "D'Arcy\" \"J(dot)M(dot)\" Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
| Cc: | darcy(at)druid(dot)net, maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs |
| Date: | 1999-01-28 19:44:41 |
| Message-ID: | F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F6226F4@cpsmail |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Thus spake Jackson, DeJuan
> > > And just seconds short of 3 hours after my report. I
> wonder how long
> > > it would take to get a fix from Oracle for something like this.
> > >
> > That depends on weather they already have the patch and were just
> > waiting for you to ask for it before giving it to you, or
> if the really
>
> I don't believe that they would get me an updated version of
> their product
> within three hours anyway. That was three hours from the time that I
> sent the bug notice to the time I had a useable product!
I never claimed that it would be 3 hours or less, because I know that it
wouldn't. What I was saying is that they could already have a fix/patch
and just not let you know about it, which I find to be absurd.
-DEJ
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-01-28 19:48:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-01-28 19:39:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof |