RE: [ADMIN] re: binary/build woes, procedural question

From: "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com>
To: "Gilley, Charles H(dot)" <Charles(dot)Gilley(at)glenayre(dot)com>, "'pgsql-admin'" <pgsql-admin(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [ADMIN] re: binary/build woes, procedural question
Date: 1998-10-14 20:47:51
Message-ID: F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F475DEC@cpsmail
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

> Well, I'm being stymied from all directions in getting 6.3.2 to run on
> my
> Ultrasparc.
> The 6.3.2 binaries have a bug with the \dt command, consequently, ODBC
> cannot
> see any tables. So I need to recompile which is itself another
> problem,
> hence my question:
>
> If I obtain the 6.3.2 sources, MUST I apply all patches to the code
> prior to
> compilation?
>
If you need what those patches will give you, then yes. Otherwise you
can ignore most of the patches. Some may require a previous one to be
there, but most (if not all) don't.
-DEJ

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerome V 1998-10-15 07:58:51 Error in compilation on hpux10.20
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-14 16:34:02 Re: [ADMIN] Why my index does not increase performance?