| From: | "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Skidmore <gskid(at)mrcabq(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Questions Mailing List <pgsql-questions(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: [QUESTIONS] Is there any work on Support for Foreign Key Clau se? |
| Date: | 1998-05-05 17:19:07 |
| Message-ID: | F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F26D937@dal_cps.cpsgroup.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Forwarded to HACKERS.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Skidmore [SMTP:gskid(at)mrcabq(dot)com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 1998 7:24 PM
> To: pgsql-questions(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: [QUESTIONS] Is there any work on Support for Foreign Key
> Clause?
>
> To Anyone who knows the answer:
>
> In PostgreSQL 6.3, SQL that contains the "FOREIGN KEY" clause results
> in
> an error message stating that the clause has not yet been implemented.
> Is there any current effort to implement it?
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> Greg Skidmore
>
>
> --
> Official WWW Site: http://www.postgresql.org
> Online Docs & FAQ: http://www.postgresql.org/docs
> Searchable Lists: http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jackson, DeJuan | 1998-05-05 17:19:33 | RE: [QUESTIONS] Transaction Logs |
| Previous Message | AliE | 1998-05-05 17:18:11 | RE: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.3 still has problem with the index |