Re: possible vacuum improvement?

How about counting the number of dead tuples examined and the number of live
tuples returned. As the ratio of dead tuples over live tuples visited
increases the table becomes a candidate for vacuuming.
-regards
richt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 4:25 PM
> To: Mario Weilguni
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] possible vacuum improvement?
>
>
> "Mario Weilguni" <mario(dot)weilguni(at)icomedias(dot)com> writes:
> > That brings me to another point, can't the
> > statistics collector used for that?
>
> Hmm, that would be a different way of attacking the problem. Not sure
> offhand which is better, but it'd surely be worth considering both.
>
> Note that collecting of dead-tuple counts requires input from aborted
> transactions as well as successful ones. I don't recall whether the
> stats collector currently collects anything from aborted xacts; that
> might or might not be a sticky point.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>