Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Case Preservation disregarding case

From: "Chuck McDevitt" <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "beau hargis" <beauh(at)bluefrogmobile(dot)com>,pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Case Preservation disregarding case
Date: 2006-10-31 17:13:31
Message-ID: EB48EBF3B239E948AC1E3F3780CF8F88012F89FA@MI8NYCMAIL02.Mi8.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-sql
Oh... And Microsoft SQLServer does something similar.

At Greenplum, we've already gotten complaints from customers about this
when they were switching from MSSQL to GP's PostgreSQL-based database.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us] 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 10:35 PM
To: Chuck McDevitt
Cc: beau hargis; pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [SQL] Case Preservation disregarding case
sensitivity?

"Chuck McDevitt" <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com> writes:
> At Teradata, we certainly interpreted the spec to allow
case-preserving,
> but case-insensitive, identifiers.



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-10-31 17:27:27
Subject: Re: --single-transaction doc clarification
Previous:From: Chuck McDevittDate: 2006-10-31 17:11:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Case Preservation disregarding case

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Curtis ScheerDate: 2006-10-31 17:15:26
Subject: Table Relationships
Previous:From: Chuck McDevittDate: 2006-10-31 17:11:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Case Preservation disregarding case

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group