Re: [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000476 ] DateStyle and Transaction

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Ludek Finstrle" <luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000476 ] DateStyle and Transaction
Date: 2005-12-10 16:20:53
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E866@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Ludek Finstrle
> Sent: 10 December 2005 06:05
> To: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000476 ] DateStyle and
> Transaction
>
> > You can respond by visiting:
> >
> http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=538&aid=1000476
> &group_id=1000125
> > Category: None
> > Group: None
> > >Status: Closed
>
> Are you sure Dave about close this bug? I don't think so.
> See this thread about the topic:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2005-12/msg00114.php

Ack sorry - that's what you get for trying to work late at night! I've
re-opened the tracker until we decide if the behaviour with the patch is
100% correct or not. At very least it's 50% better than before :-)

> Do you think it's good idea to do explicit begin, commit around
> connect settings all the time? I don't have time for test
> this behaviour yet.

Probably wouldn't be a bad idea - at the very least one tx with all the
hard-coded queries, then one for any user-supplied connect string. I'll
try to find some time to look in the next few days (pretty busy
releasing pgAdmin 1.4.1 and PostgreSQL 8.1.1/8.0.5 for Windows atm).

Regards, Dave

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ludek Finstrle 2005-12-10 17:16:00 Re: [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000476 ] DateStyle and Transaction
Previous Message noreply 2005-12-10 16:17:37 [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000476 ] DateStyle and Transaction