Re: [HACKERS] Dbsize backend integration

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au]
> Sent: 05 July 2005 02:39
> To: Robert Treat
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; Dave Page; Tom Lane; Dawid Kuroczko;
> Andreas Pflug; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration
>
> >>You are into the cycle we were in. We discussed pg_object size (too
> >>vague) and pg_index_size (needs pg_toast_size too, and maybe toast
> >>indexes; too many functions).
> >
> > Yeah, I read those discussions, and think you were better
> off then than you
> > are now, which is why I went back to it somewhat.
>
> To be honest, the amount of effort being expended on this naming
> discussion far outweighs the benefits. Maybe it's time for a core
> member to step in and just resolve it - one way or the other?

Agreed. The current names were discussed (at some length!) by Bruce & I
before I reworked the latest version of the patch. Can we just settle on
that?

Regards, Dave.