Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
Date: 2006-07-16 16:12:19
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E48508A7@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org on behalf of Tom Lane
Sent: Sun 7/16/2006 3:29 PM
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it

> AFAICT, snake is the only Windows machine that
> actually runs the buildfarm on a regular schedule, and even it is just
> running once a day.

I can bump that up as high as you'd like within reason. 4? 6 times a day?

I have spare licences for most versions of Windows as well, so if Microsoft's virtual server product is not too expensive for us I can probably add a few platform variations to that box. I'll look into it.

Regards, Dave.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-07-16 16:15:57 Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-07-16 15:57:55 Re: Restartable Recovery