Re: New release

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Joost Kraaijeveld" <J(dot)Kraaijeveld(at)Askesis(dot)nl>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New release
Date: 2005-02-13 18:14:49
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4528ADA@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joost Kraaijeveld [mailto:J(dot)Kraaijeveld(at)Askesis(dot)nl]
> Sent: 12 February 2005 10:15
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: RE: [ODBC] New release
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Attached a makefile (the patch is as big a the makefile) that
> allows VC to both build a release and a debug version.
>
> Changes:
> - Paths to seperate debug output directories are set
> - Added a missing "\" after "$(INTDIR)\win_md5.obj" in the
> debug section

Err, OK - not sure why the patch is so bit (line end problem perhaps? I
committed a fix based on what was originally in there (it must have got
removed in error).

> Question: do we really need the win_md5.c file? It hinders
> compilation with Eclipse "Managed Make Project" and the file
> can be replaced with appropriate -D options.

What's Eclipse? And I'm not sure what D option you mean - cl.exe uses D
for defining macros.

> BTW: the drivers compiles OK with MinGW. Is there any
> interest in a MinGW based Eclipse Project or simple makefile?

I was thinking that we could start building purely in Mingw now that the
backend does. The preferred way would be to use the existing autoconf
build systems (as used on Unix). I haven't had a chance to try yet, but
if you want to, please do.

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joost Kraaijeveld 2005-02-13 20:22:03 Bug in ODBC driver 08.00.0004 and stored procedure
Previous Message Dave Page 2005-02-11 21:14:06 Re: Bug in convert.c copy_and_convert_field