From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RFC: Update wizard |
Date: | 2004-12-03 13:31:53 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4527C8E@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 03 December 2004 13:19
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFC: Update wizard
>
> > No, it doesn't, unless it finds a placeholder such as $Id.
> Even then,
> > I don't think it does so for binary files.
>
> Of course $Id would be necessary. But if CVS doesn't stamp
> the file, how do you want CVS to handle the revision marking?
CVS doesn't have to mark the file internally. Consider what happens if
you try to check out a specific revision of a file - we can do that via
the web, eg:
http://cvs.pgadmin.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/pgadmin3/src/ui/ar_SA/pgadmin
3.po?rev=1.20
Gets us rev 1.20.
In a similar was it shouldn't be difficult to query cvs for the latest
version number of a given file.
> Its not as easy as that...
> for pgadmin base package, I'd only inform about new packages.
> I wonder if we can do this even system specific, i.e. inform
> about deb packages on debian, ...
Even if it just opened a browser at the selected mirror it would be
helpful. Other than that, how do we determine the exact OS (ie. the
difference between redahat9 and suse8 for example)?
> For languages, a more complex selection for updating existing
> and adding new ones is necessary.
Yeah, though that shouldn't be a major problem as they're platform
independent.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-12-03 13:34:33 | Re: New ftp layout |
Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2004-12-03 13:25:51 | Re: New ftp layout |