From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Mark Morgan Lloyd" <markMLl(dot)pgsql-odbc(at)telemetry(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Latest ODBC driver? |
Date: | 2006-08-29 10:56:45 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40154C8A8@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Mark
> Morgan Lloyd
> Sent: 29 August 2006 11:51
> To: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Latest ODBC driver?
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> > > Does this correspond to the versions of e.g. odbc32.dll as
> > > shown in the control panel?
> >
> > No - it's just the version of the spec that the driver supports.
>
> OK, so if I read you correctly that's the version of the spec
> that the low-level
> drivers tell the ODBC DLLs they're prepared to implement.
Yeah.
>
> OK, I think I've got an issue here relating to the BDE and
> the ANSI driver :-(
>
> Running the failing program with the 8.01.0200 drivers and
> the 3.50.33.8 ODBC
> DLLs memory usage explodes when it tries to execute the
> initial query, which is
> basically there to establish communications with the tables.
> At present I think
> that the problem is hidden somewhere inside the BDE but I'll
> see if I can
> progress this further later.
Don't use 08.01.xxxx if you can help it - it's totally different from
08.02. A closer match would be the older 07 series.
08.01 was a change in architecture that unfortunately didn't work out
well. 08.02 is going back to the original architecture.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Morgan Lloyd | 2006-08-29 11:21:41 | Re: Latest ODBC driver? |
Previous Message | Mark Morgan Lloyd | 2006-08-29 10:51:20 | Re: Latest ODBC driver? |