Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for

From: Richard Welty <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for
Date: 2003-03-24 22:07:00
Message-ID: E18xa5s-0007eL-00@skipper.averillpark.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:46:42 -0700 (MST) "scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> wrote:
> Just this one area alone shows the great difference in philosophy
> between
> the two databases. It's not that one is better than the other, it's
> that
> they're aimed at difference audiences.

i did a lot of C code back in the early to mid 80s, and got used to fending
for myself.

then i spent 10 years as a professional lisp developer, mostly using lisp
machines.

when i went back to normal languages, i realized how important it is to
have systems actually enforce rules about data for you. i prefer postgresql
for the simple reason that if i use it properly, it will protect me from
much of my own stupidity as a developer, just like my lisp machine used to.

people who turn off these features to gain speed are asking for a world of
hurt somewhere down the line.

richard
--
Richard Welty rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolai Petri 2003-03-24 22:12:50 plpgsql and setting array values.
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-03-24 22:05:10 Re: [GENERAL] PL/Java (was: stored procedures)