| From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gregory Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "Matteo Beccati" <php(at)beccati(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: @ versus ~, redux |
| Date: | 2006-09-04 12:22:31 |
| Message-ID: | E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA579014DC042@m0143.s-mxs.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > > "x @< y" means "x is contained in y"
> > >
> > > ltree <@ ltree
> >
> > If you consider ltree entries to be sets containing all their
children
> > then those sound consistent.
Now we get to decide whether "<@" was better than the now proposed "@<"
:-)
I like <@. (or we stay clear by using the inet ops)
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-09-04 12:28:56 | Re: [PATCHES] Documentation fix for --with-ldap |
| Previous Message | Gevik Babakhani | 2006-09-04 12:12:34 | TODO Item : GRANT/REVOKE to all schema objects |