Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
Cc: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christian Cryder <c(dot)s(dot)cryder(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
Date: 2005-07-19 23:08:43
Message-ID: DFF305E9-BD3B-47DA-BA3E-451DD5368EBB@fastcrypt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Christian is perfectly happy with

a PGTimestamp, and a PGTimestamptz type.

I did some research and Oracle has an extended PreparedStatement, which
implements

setTimestamp, and setTimestamptz, so I imagine they have run into the
same issues

Dave
On 19-Jul-05, at 6:59 PM, Oliver Jowett wrote:

> Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> For that matter we could use a PGUnknown type as well.
>>
>
> This is exactly what the patch I mentioned earlier did, IIRC.
>
> -O
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeffrey Tenny 2005-07-19 23:11:39 Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
Previous Message Oliver Jowett 2005-07-19 23:08:30 Re: Streaming ResultSet