| From: | David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? |
| Date: | 2006-04-01 23:39:04 |
| Message-ID: | DFAF3AD7-1215-4016-9651-2B2D8229CF33@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Apr 1, 2006, at 06:58, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Next time you submit a patch, please consider reading it before
> sending
> it out.
I just read the patch, and it looks fine to me. No typos that I
noticed. I might have screwed up the SGML stuff, but I know even less
about SGML than I do about autoconf and configure. :-)
So, pray tell, what have I screwed up? I would of course be happy to
submit a corrected patch.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Juan Manuel Diaz Lara | 2006-04-01 23:44:14 | Problem compiling with mingw |
| Previous Message | David Wheeler | 2006-04-01 23:37:44 | Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Wheeler | 2006-04-01 23:45:39 | Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? |
| Previous Message | David Wheeler | 2006-04-01 23:37:44 | Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? |