Re: Several optimization options (config/hardware)

From: "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: "Martin Grotzke *EXTERN*" <martin(dot)grotzke(at)googlemail(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Several optimization options (config/hardware)
Date: 2012-05-03 07:26:40
Message-ID: D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C207D4FCC1@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Martin Grotzke wrote:
> we want to see if we can gain better performance with our postgresql
> database. In the last year the amount of data growed from ~25G to now
> ~140G and we're currently developing a new feature that needs to get
> data faster from the database. The system is both read and write
heavy.
>
> At first I want to give you an overview over the hardware, software
and
> configuration and the changes that I see we could check out. I'd be
very
> happy if you could review and tell if the one or the other is
nonsense.
>
> Hardware:
> - CPU: 4x4 Cores Intel Xeon L5630 @ 2.13GHz
> - RAM: 64GB
> - RAID 1 (1+0) HP Company Smart Array G6 controllers, P410i
> (I don't know the actual number of discs)
> - A single partition for data and wal-files
>
> Software
> - RHEL 6, Kernel 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64
> - postgresql90-server-9.0.6-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64

You could try different kernel I/O elevators and see if that improves
something.

I have made good experiences with elevator=deadline and elevator=noop.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Klemme 2012-05-03 07:28:14 Re: Configuration Recommendations
Previous Message John Lister 2012-05-03 06:54:10 Re: Configuration Recommendations