Design decision curiosity

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Design decision curiosity
Date: 2002-10-19 02:54:54
Message-ID: D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920D337@voyager.corporate.connx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I am curious as to why it is necessary to add PL/pgSQL as a language
instead of including it by default.
Is it to save space on small systems or???

Since the code necessary PL/pgSQL is very small, it does not seem like
there would be much savings. I imagine that there is occasionally some
confusion with manuals describing the use of PL/pgSQL and yet the
language does not exist until installation.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-10-19 03:01:49 Re: ECPG and bison
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2002-10-19 02:41:19 Re: autocommit vs TRUNCATE et al