From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Cramer" <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> |
Cc: | <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres idea list |
Date: | 2002-06-26 19:21:32 |
Message-ID: | D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF61015112@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Cramer [mailto:Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net]
> Sent: 26 June 2002 19:01
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Rod Taylor
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres idea list
>
>
> Dave,
>
> Would you consider java as a platform independant language? I
> have started a project on sf.net called jpgadmin, but I see
> the duplication of effort as a waste of time.
I do, but I've had nothing but bad experiences with Java though I'm open
to new evidence/persuasion. I do agree that duplication of effort is not
a good idea and I'm certainly not against collaborating on a new version
though I must point out that having written pgAdmin from scratch twice
now (three times if you cound my original proof of concept) over the
last 5-6 years, I have *very* specific ideas on how pgAdmin should work.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that as it's been *my* project for
years (not forgetting the contributions from Jean-Michel & others),
changing that and working as another member of a team would be *very*
difficult for me.
I hope you can understand this, having spent hundreds of hours and
written 100,000+ lines of production code _almost_ single handedly it
gets kinda personnal :-)
Let me say now though, even if I do stay with my own version, if you
ever need help don't hesitate to ask.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2002-06-26 19:25:05 | Database comparison ideas |
Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2002-06-26 19:08:09 | Re: Postgres idea list |