Re: A different approach to extension NO USER DATA feature

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: A different approach to extension NO USER DATA feature
Date: 2011-02-07 00:56:19
Message-ID: D56480A0-5ABD-48FE-8005-757538F06C25@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Feb 6, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> I've not attempted to implement this idea, but offhand it looks like
> it would take a day or two's work, which seems well worthwhile to
> expend now in the hope of getting this feature right the first tim

Seems worthwhile, and a much better approach. But do we really want to limit it only to tables?

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-02-07 01:02:05 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Force strings passed to and from plperl to be in UTF8 encoding.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-02-06 23:48:51 Re: pgsql: remove tags.