Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)
Date: 2011-03-01 21:15:24
Message-ID: D2B293BD-D428-4919-A86A-79BA75E117C5@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mar 1, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Collation, not correlation.

Yeah, I'm fat-fingered today.

> The question is what collation property the
> citext type needs to have, and how we get it to have that setting during
> an upgrade from 9.0. See
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/11548.1297983024@sss.pgh.pa.us

Ah, I remember now. That lead to this:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-02/msg01824.php

So it looks like what Peter said about updating the catalog is what needs to be done, and is simple, yes? But then pg_dump needs more collation-juju. Am I right?

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message daveg 2011-03-01 21:17:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set happend during repeatable vacuum
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-03-01 21:12:28 Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)