Re: Postgre Performance

From: "Deshpande, Yogesh Sadashiv (STSD-Openview)" <yogesh-sadashiv(dot)deshpande(at)hp(dot)com>
To: Raghavendra <raghavendra(dot)rao(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgre Performance
Date: 2011-10-18 17:38:19
Message-ID: D1845D432CC3A64F8653DFEFB3732D5017B327B4@G4W3296.americas.hpqcorp.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I am not able to find binary distribution of pgbouncer for windows.. Can you point me to the location?

From: Raghavendra [mailto:raghavendra(dot)rao(at)enterprisedb(dot)com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 10:33 PM
To: Bill Moran
Cc: Deshpande, Yogesh Sadashiv (STSD-Openview); pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgre Performance

> We need following information
>
> 1. Is there any configuration we do that would pool the connection request rather than coming out with connection limit exceed.
Use pgpool or pgbouncer.

Use pgbouncer, which is a light weighted connection pooling tool, if you are not opting for load balancing.

> Basically we wanted to limit the number of processes so that client code doesn't have to retry for unavailability for connection or sub processes , but postgre takes care of queuing?

For controlling unavailability of connections, it may be possible at application level but its not possible at Database level. However, if connections reaches max limit, DB will alert you as it reached max_connection.

--Raghav

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Samuel Hwang 2011-10-18 17:39:32 Can someone help explain what's going on from the attached logs?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2011-10-18 17:18:14 Re: Postgre Performance