Re: More extension issues: ownership and search_path

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More extension issues: ownership and search_path
Date: 2011-02-07 17:54:10
Message-ID: CE211848-7FB3-4663-8D77-1236950E3FEE@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Feb 7, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Interesting point. It's all right at the moment because I tweaked
> pg_dump_sort.c so that procedural languages are dumped before modules.
> But maybe we should convert the PLs to modules.

s/modules/extensions/?

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-07 17:55:11 Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2011-02-07 17:52:04 Re: More extension issues: ownership and search_path