From: | Rob Napier <rob(at)doitonce(dot)net(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why new users come to PostgreSQL (IMHO) |
Date: | 2012-09-13 20:00:20 |
Message-ID: | CC787874.9E5C%rob@doitonce.net.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Josh
I am pleased to see this discussion happening. I would like to suggest that
we work on a position statement along the lines that you have posted as a
position statement for the media. I've been asked to substantiate our belief
in the likely uptake of 9.2. There is a lot of great material here that can
be used.
On 14/09/12 5:32 AM, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Chris, JPA,
>
> The other BIG reasons why folks come to PostgreSQL are two groups:
>
> The Django team, by putting PostgreSQL as the default database, has let
> to a LOT of adoption in the Python world, and
>
> Heroku and the Rails 3.1 team have made PostgreSQL the new default
> database for Rails.
>
> MySQL came to prominence partly on the coat-tails of PHP. We're doing
> the same with Django and Rails.
>
> A lot of the rest of our recent adoption falls under the heading of "not
> screwing up". We've kept improving the database continuously. We've
> listened to users about what they want. We've kept PostgreSQL a
> non-profit community. We've avoided community splits and hostile forks.
> We've been community-minded but business-friendly at the same time.
>
> However, now is no time to relax. The new databases will continue to
> improve, and they're very aggressive about recruiting new users. We're
> "on top" now, but that just gives others an incentive to push us off.
Regards
Rob Napier
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Travers | 2012-09-14 00:28:02 | Re: Why new users come to PostgreSQL (IMHO) |
Previous Message | Nikolas Everett | 2012-09-13 19:59:25 | Re: Why new users come to PostgreSQL (IMHO) |