Re: WIP: Access method extendability

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Access method extendability
Date: 2016-03-29 17:34:07
Message-ID: CAPpHfdvqnUxOP3bfaGBHd5uMMwxGJ6kxUgY2UxjP2CGh=AmjTA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:

> I incorporated your changes and did some additional refinements on top of
>> them
>> still.
>>
>> Attached is delta against v12, that should cause less issues when merging
>> for
>> Teodor.
>>
>
> But last version is 13th?
>
> BTW, it would be cool to add odcs in VII. Internals chapter, description
> should be similar to index's interface description, i.e. how to use generic
> WAL interface.

We already have generic WAL interface description in comments to
generic_xlog.c. I'm not fan of duplicating things. What about moving
interface description from comments to docs completely?

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-03-29 17:42:39 Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2016-03-29 17:32:44 Re: WIP: Access method extendability