Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points
Date: 2012-04-09 08:52:12
Message-ID: CAPpHfdvJKy0oDywXvz5M-c3ZHpebELbHMJ8VRzZtOBZFGGpUYQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> I believe that attached version of patch can be backpatched. It fixes this
> problem without altering of index building procedure. It just makes checks
> in internal pages softener enough to compensate effect of gist_box_same
> implementation.
>

Any comments about this?

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2012-04-09 09:11:39 Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Previous Message Vikash3 S 2012-04-09 05:43:44 [patch] for "psql : Allow processing of multiple -f (file) options "