Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10 and system performance is not so good

From: Tejaswini GC <tejaswini(dot)gc(at)decathlon(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10 and system performance is not so good
Date: 2020-04-02 11:09:41
Message-ID: CAPmH4y3Lx4JwJjqq0h5rJmAPkqvrbtOPZLjbfs_bEVapjfHUGg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-performance

Hello Julien,

Thanks for your inputs,
I shall get back to you If some information is needed.

*Regards*
*Tejaswini G C*
*IT Retail Team*

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 4:35 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Please don't top-post, it makes it hard to follow the discussion.
>
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 03:52:56PM +0530, Tejaswini GC wrote:
> >
> > I'm in touch with our hosting team to get more information for your
> queries.
> > As of now I can share these details.
> > We did analyze on the DB, but not the vacuum,
> > We are using AWS RDS.
> >
> > Please help me with these queries as well.
> >
> > 1) Will the process change if we use AWS RDS.
>
>
> No idea, that's a question you should ask them.
>
>
> > 2) What kind of vacuum should be done on the DB, as there are many types
> of
> > vacuum.
>
>
> A regular vacuum, as in:
>
> VACUUM ANALYZE
>
> in all your databases.
>
>
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 2:17 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 03:52:25AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> > > > The following bug has been logged on the website:
> > > >
> > > > Bug reference: 16334
> > > > Logged by: Tejaswini GC
> > > > Email address: tejaswini(dot)gc(at)decathlon(dot)com
> > > > PostgreSQL version: 10.10
> > > > Operating system: Centos 7
> > > > Description:
> > >
> > >
> > > First of all, this is not a bug. You should have instead started a
> > > discussion
> > > on pgsql-general or pgsql-performance. I'm redirecting the discussion
> on
> > > -performance.
> > >
> > >
> > > > We have upgraded our database into version 10.10.
> > >
> > >
> > > How did you upgrade?
> > >
> > >
> > > > After upgrading we could see that the system performance is bad , and
> > > one of
> > > > the applications linked to it via web service is not working.
> > >
> > >
> > > Do you have any errors in the postgres logs?
> > >
> > >
> > > > During this upgrade we have not done any code changes either on the
> > > > application side or on our ERP side.
> > > >
> > > > We are trying to debug everything from application perse, but till
> now
> > > we do
> > > > not have any lead.
> > > >
> > > > Can you tell us are there any measures that we need to take after
> > > upgrade.
> > >
> > >
> > > It depends on how you did the upgrade. If you used pg_upgrade, did you
> > > run the
> > > generated script as documented in step 13 at
> > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/pgupgrade.html?
> > >
> > > Otherwise, at least a database-wide VACUUM ANALYZE on every database
> is the
> > > bare minimum to run after an upgrade.
> > >
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mario Emmenlauer 2020-04-02 11:59:12 Re: BUG #16336: Undefined symbols since upgrade of VS to 2019.5.2, and other issues
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-04-02 11:04:36 Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10 and system performance is not so good

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message postgann2020 s 2020-04-02 19:37:43 Could someone please help us share the procedure to troubleshoot the locks on proc issues.
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-04-02 11:04:36 Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10 and system performance is not so good