Re: segfault with plproxy

From: Filip Rembiałkowski <filip(dot)rembialkowski(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: segfault with plproxy
Date: 2011-12-19 12:36:09
Message-ID: CAP_rwwmWPV-qDJG8h+g6DtTY6_sJDgC-zF1ukMuNw9HU6MmW5A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

W dniu 19 grudnia 2011 10:39 użytkownik Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> napisał:

> It seems you are making plproxy call public.list_users() recursively.
> Postgres probably OOM-s somewhere then.

I have log_statement='all' and the function is called only once:

2011-12-19 13:15:11 CET 20416 [local] testdb filip LOG: statement:
select * from list_users('%xyz%');
2011-12-19 13:15:11 CET 20400 LOG: server process (PID 20416) was
terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MURAT KOÇ 2011-12-19 13:01:28 Changing Passwords as Encrypted not Clear-Text
Previous Message Filip Rembiałkowski 2011-12-19 12:05:20 Re: segfault with plproxy