Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?

From: Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?
Date: 2012-07-16 21:42:38
Message-ID: CAPTjJmobYm+Qt3eX6PPPtNeW-L=UkQf_gBN3vJ5YLefeEfPPHg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Sergey Konoplev
<sergey(dot)konoplev(at)postgresql-consulting(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> As I understand the docs for rsync, it will use both mod time and file size
>>> if told not to do checksums.
>
> I wonder if it is correct in general to use mtime and size to perform
> these checks from the point of view of PostgreSQL.
>
> If it works with the current version then is there a guaranty that it
> will work with the future versions?

That was my exact question. Ideally, I'd like to hear from someone who
works with the Postgres internals, but the question may not even be
possible to answer.

ChrisA

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steven Schlansker 2012-07-16 21:52:34 Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?
Previous Message Chris Bartlett 2012-07-16 21:30:13 Re: Can't figure out how to use now() in default for tsrange column (PG 9.2)