| From: | Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Deprecating RULES |
| Date: | 2012-10-17 18:02:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAOzAquKedjH7ShhRqgs68YCD=12FBTE9DJstzzwDXV4D8i_qcA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/12/12, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> I realize you weren't around when we removed row OIDs, but I was *still*
> getting flack from that in 2008. And we lost entire OSS projects to
> other databases because of removing row OIDs. And those were marked
> deprecated for 3 years before we removed them.
FWIW, the documentation for 9.2 still mentions OIDs and the
'default_with_oids' parameter, in what release was it announced they
would be removed and in what release were they removed?
--
Mike Nolan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-10-17 18:06:13 | Re: Deprecating RULES |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-10-17 17:50:02 | Re: Deprecating RULES |