Re: Getting query plan alternatives from query planner?

From: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Getting query plan alternatives from query planner?
Date: 2014-03-21 07:51:31
Message-ID: CAOeZVifDg=Q6V-iAwLHr7zfUDFpGkqsKK-s108VrfbL0GaOQ9g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi Tom
>
> You wrote:
> > Path alternatives are rejected
> > whenever possible before moving up to the next join level, so that what
> > we have rejected is actually just a plan fragment in most cases.
>
> Thanks for the quick answer. This sounds like a fair implementation
> decision.
>
> Background for asking this is of course, that one want's 1. to
> understand and 2. influence the optimizer in cases where one thinks
> that the planner is wrong :-).
>
> So, the bottom line is
> 1. that PostgreSQL doesn't offer no means to understand the planner
> except EXPLAIN-ing the chosen plan?
> 2. and there's no road map to introduce planner hinting (like in
> EnterpriseDB or Ora)?
>
>
We recently had some discussion for planner hints. There is no plan for
having planner hints ATM. However, we are looking at ways at which we can
improve the query planner for some cases where it makes statistical bad
estimations and gives bad plans.

Regards,

Atri

--
Regards,

Atri
*l'apprenant*

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vincent 2014-03-21 08:17:39 Re: slow join not using index properly
Previous Message Stefan Keller 2014-03-21 07:37:55 Re: Getting query plan alternatives from query planner?