| From: | Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)orgMerlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application |
| Date: | 2012-04-17 14:10:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAOeZVid78wh_JaZWYoGRxpL1JFnb2o5-4XJ==2Hb8p5V8zHKLg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
> On 04/17/2012 09:12 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
>>
>> I just had a small doubt I wanted to clarify.I initially said in my
>> proposal that I would be using SPI for getting the FDW API to call Pl/Java
>> functions,but now,after discussion with the community,I have changed the
>> approach and I will be using JNI Invocation API instead for the same
>> purpose. I wanted to know if I need to send a modified proposal for the same
>> or the original proposal shall still hold good.
>
>
> These are not the right forums to ask this question. You need to ask on the
> GSOC specific forum.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
Thanks Andrew.I'll keep that in mind.
--
Regards,
Atri
l'apprenant
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-17 14:11:27 | Re: Gsoc2012 idea, tablesample |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-04-17 14:07:58 | Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bernard | 2012-04-22 00:57:59 | Cannot pass null in Parameter in Query for ISNULL |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-04-17 14:07:58 | Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application |