| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)orgMerlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application |
| Date: | 2012-04-17 14:07:58 |
| Message-ID: | 4F8D793E.1070703@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On 04/17/2012 09:12 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
> I just had a small doubt I wanted to clarify.I initially said in my
> proposal that I would be using SPI for getting the FDW API to call
> Pl/Java functions,but now,after discussion with the community,I have
> changed the approach and I will be using JNI Invocation API instead
> for the same purpose. I wanted to know if I need to send a modified
> proposal for the same or the original proposal shall still hold good.
These are not the right forums to ask this question. You need to ask on
the GSOC specific forum.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Atri Sharma | 2012-04-17 14:10:30 | Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application |
| Previous Message | Alex Shulgin | 2012-04-17 14:04:49 | Re: Last gasp |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Atri Sharma | 2012-04-17 14:10:30 | Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application |
| Previous Message | Atri Sharma | 2012-04-17 13:12:48 | Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application |