Re: Time limit for a process to hold Content lock in Buffer Cache

From: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time limit for a process to hold Content lock in Buffer Cache
Date: 2013-05-23 15:26:36
Message-ID: CAOeZVicDO4wmHksD-kaHrJO9QtUj23iDyfcSgjv0XMctM5SUdQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> No, you're not following. These would be table-level heavyweight locks,
> and there already are timeout mechanisms that work at that level.
>

Oh,right.Sorry,I missed that. I will go and research heavyweight locks now.

Thanks a ton!

Regards,

Atri

--
Regards,

Atri
l'apprenant

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Atri Sharma 2013-05-23 15:28:43 Re: Time limit for a process to hold Content lock in Buffer Cache
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-05-23 15:26:35 Re: streaming replication, "frozen snapshot backup on it" and missing relfile (postgres 9.2.3 on xfs + LVM)