| From: | Neil Conway <neil(dot)conway(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Memory allocation in spi_printtup() |
| Date: | 2015-08-17 16:22:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAOW5sYb+_TgreFdAg_2o-rfXE2WAhU4GZNrhEiKpe4iC0n8KDg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Hi Neil! Long time no see.
Likewise :)
>> Attached is a one-liner to double the size of the table when space is
>> exhausted.
>
> I think this could use a comment, but otherwise seems OK.
Attached is a revised patch with a comment.
> Should we back-patch this change? Seems like it's arguably a
> performance bug.
Sounds good to me.
Neil
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| spi-printtup-alloc-2.patch | text/x-patch | 528 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-08-17 16:30:56 | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Bear Giles | 2015-08-17 15:36:02 | Re: what would tar file FDW look like? |