Re: backup-strategies for large databases

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: MirrorX <mirrorx(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: backup-strategies for large databases
Date: 2011-08-15 23:12:30
Message-ID: CAOR=d=33Bdx6b0MtTODJUjERYTvXU=CSzJv-WP6OPS+05wD5eQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:06 PM, MirrorX <mirrorx(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> i looked into data partitioning and it is definitely something we will use
> soon. but, as far as the backups are concerned, how can i take a backup
> incrementally? if i get it correctly, the idea is to partition a big table
> (using a date field for example) and then take each night for example a dump
> of the 'daily' partition. so that the dump of this specific table will be
> relatively small to the size of the initial table. is that right?
>
> so, we are talking about logical backups without PITR. i am not saying that
> it's a bad idea, i just want to make sure that i got it right.

Exactly. Sometimes PITR is the right answer, sometimes partitioning is.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2011-08-15 23:15:47 Re: backup-strategies for large databases
Previous Message MirrorX 2011-08-15 23:06:39 Re: backup-strategies for large databases