Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Robert Klemme <shortcutter(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB
Date: 2011-09-13 19:27:11
Message-ID: CAOR=d=2+4r1=6ZGDaQHb+UN1HjVUwP4LwDwKqS=WdjJC5Vuh8Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Are you sure? In theory I always understood that there are no
> "subtransactions".

"subtransaction" is just another way of saying save points / rollback.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gianni Ciolli 2011-09-13 19:48:19 Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB
Previous Message Samuel Gendler 2011-09-13 19:13:57 raid array seek performance