| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: what Linux to run |
| Date: | 2012-03-01 15:21:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAOR=d=1_mBkVgTMCUXeQEC0tr=c0yLrbHSXzGrsKH8p=nLS1=Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org> wrote:
>
> One interesting thing I've discovered recently is that there is a HUGE
> difference in performance between CentOS 6.0 and Ubuntu Server 10.04
> (LTS) in at least the memory allocator and possibly also multithreading
> libraries (in favour of CentOS). PostgreSQL shouldn't be particularly
> sensitive to either of these, but it makes me wonder what else is
> suboptimal in Ubuntu.
To be fair, RHEL6 was released 7 months after Ubuntu 10.04. But
Redhat is pretty good at kernel patching for optimizations ertc. I'd
be more interested in comparisons with ubuntu 12.04, due out next
month.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Dunkler | 2012-03-01 16:41:08 | 100% cpu usage on some postmaster processes kill the complete database |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2012-03-01 14:47:17 | Re: Allowed DML on replicas? |