Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Date: 2015-07-01 15:28:56
Message-ID: CANP8+jLfZ75PP=S-_Ein3ZBMAGsY5gPQxsycAdybV-SZxGenzQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 30 April 2015 at 12:07, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> This patch lack some point: documentation, comment in source code,
> etc, so it's WIP patch yet,
> but I think that it's enough to discuss about this.
>

Code comments exist to indicate the intention of sections of code. They are
essential for reviewers, not a cosmetic thing to be added later. To gain
wide agreement we need wide understanding. (I recommend a development
approach where you write the comments first, then add code later.)

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-07-01 15:55:48 Re: Macro nesting hell
Previous Message Sawada Masahiko 2015-07-01 15:13:46 Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.