From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
Date: | 2016-04-08 13:36:19 |
Message-ID: | CANP8+jLTOqWLZ+k9iwb_3xNYczjipHqXLgqoQa1TxQjbACmVKA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7 April 2016 at 07:29, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
With the test case attached in my case the COMMIT PREPARED record does
> not even get replayed.
>
I was surprised to see this in the test...
sleep 2; # wait for changes to arrive on slave
I think the test framework needs a WaitForLSN function to allow us to know
for certain that something has been delivered.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stas Kelvich | 2016-04-08 13:45:12 | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
Previous Message | Rushabh Lathia | 2016-04-08 13:21:23 | Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW |