Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention
Date: 2015-06-29 17:02:10
Message-ID: CANP8+jKZYHxaWCuJJ2Fkp+cS_8GsP2FGCWu+5Axa1inHWZJaXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 29 June 2015 at 16:27, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Thanks to Robert Haas for having discussion (offlist) about the idea
> and suggestions to improve it and also Andres Freund for having
> discussion and sharing thoughts about this idea at PGCon.
>

Weird. This patch is implemented exactly the way I said to implement it
publicly at PgCon.

Was nobody recording the discussion at the unconference??

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-06-29 17:11:04 Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2015-06-29 16:20:11 Re: PANIC in GIN code